3 designs on your 65×131 ft lot·pick one to work on, export, and share
Thornton
★ BEST MATCH3 bed · 2 bath · 47×29 ft · 1,362 sq ft · matches 75%
$495,712est. construction
Affordability100
Natural light100
Privacy43
Open layout100
Energy9
Usable space100
Tier 0 · fast estimates · relative to these options
Passes all 10 enforced code & program rules
Design quality 98/100 — 39/40 best practices met
Tightest: Habitable room width — Bed3 is 9.5 ft wide (min 7 ft). (IRC 2021 R304.2)
Tightest: Hallway width — Hall is 5.3 ft wide (min 3 ft). (IRC 2021 R311.6)
Ashford
4 bed · 2 bath · 58×29 ft · 1,682 sq ft · matches 17%
$572,818est. construction
Affordability0
Natural light0
Privacy100
Open layout0
Energy0
Usable space0
Tier 0 · fast estimates · relative to these options
Passes all 10 enforced code & program rules
Design quality 98/100 — 40/41 best practices met
Tightest: Habitable room width — Dining is 8.1 ft wide (min 7 ft). (IRC 2021 R304.2)
Tightest: Required adjacencies — 91% of required room connections are made. (Functional / plumbing requirement)
Fairfax
3 bed · 3 bath · 61×24 ft · 1,464 sq ft · matches 60%
$550,377est. construction
Affordability29
Natural light91
Privacy0
Open layout83
Energy100
Usable space57
Tier 0 · fast estimates · relative to these options
Passes all 10 enforced code & program rules
Design quality 100/100 — 38/38 best practices met
1 placement note: the TV sits 6 ft off the sofa's centerline
Tightest: Habitable room width — Bed2 is 8.8 ft wide (min 7 ft). (IRC 2021 R304.2)
Tightest: Hallway width — Hall is 4.5 ft wide (min 3 ft). (IRC 2021 R311.6)
Preliminary, advisory concept generated by an optimization engine — not a stamped construction document. Have a licensed architect or engineer review any design before building.